//
archives

Retail

This category contains 82 posts

Thirty-Four Innovative CPG Products


Almond milk, enhanced water, and Greek yogurt were among the 34 products launched between 2008 and 2010 that broke through the clutter to be come innovators in their category. These products comprise less than 0.5% of all product introductions during one of the worst recessions in a generation.

Nielsen analyzed more than 11,000 these new products and selected the winners of the 2012 Nielsen Breakthrough Innovation Awards, presented recently at its Consumer 360 annual conference. In contrast to innovation awards focused on “one-year wonders,” these awards honor new products that succeed on multiple dimensions over a three-year period. This is the first year Nielsen has presented the award.

“To successfully launch a new product in any economy is beating the odds, but to launch and sustain success during a recession is remarkable,” said Vicki Gardner, senior vice president, product innovation, Nielsen.  “Breakthrough Innovation Award winners have unique bragging rights among CPG innovators.”

The 2012 Breakthrough Innovation winners are:

Platinum

2010 – Glaceau vitaminwater zero

2009 – Chobani, Prevacid24HR

2008 – Zyrtec, Bud Light Lime, Arnold Select Sandwich Thins

Gold

2010 – Silk PureAlmond Milk, Thomas’ Bagel Thins, U by Kotex, PF Chang’s Home Menu, Schick Hydro

2009 – SoBe 0 Calorie Lifewater, Trop 50, Trident Layers, Plan B One-Step, Budweiser Select 55, Next Choice, Dove Men+Care

2008 – Nature Sweet Cherubs, Powerade ION4 Zero, Wonderful Pistachios, Tide Total Care

Silver

2010 – Special K Fruit Crisps, Oscar Mayer Selects, Lean Cuisine Market Collection

2009 – Nature Pride Variety Bread, Olay Professional Pro-X, Align Probiotic, Tide Stain Release, Fancy Feast Appetizers

2008 – Keebler Town House Flipsides, Miller Genuine Draft 64, Always Infinity, K-Y Yours+Mine

To be considered for the award, CPG companies were expected to deliver on the following attributes:

1. Distinctiveness: A new value proposition. Brand re-stages, ingredient reformulations, re-packaging, size changes, and close-in line extensions were excluded.

2. Relevance: One-year sales of $25 million or greater in the channels Nielsen historically measures.

3. Category Impact: Outperformance of the average product in its category on sales velocity, as measured by sales per distribution point.

4. Endurance: True success is measured over time. Winners were required to at least maintain or grow sales in year two, achieving at least 90 percent of year-one sales in year two.

Although the study was conducted at the product level, there were companies whose successes underscored an organization-wide commitment to ongoing product innovation. Procter & Gamble led the way with five initiatives making the list. Anheuser-Busch, Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson, Kellogg, Nestlé, PepsiCo, and Unilever each had two initiatives.

Winners followed multiple paths, but shared common themes.  One trait shared was the understanding that getting it right the first time is neither likely nor important. Winners built a test-and-refine process to build in iterations before launch.  Also, Breakthrough Innovation Leaders followed one of two activation models:

Sprinters: Products that race out of the gate in year one, then allow momentum to sustain in-market performance in

year two.

Marathoners: Products that deliberately start out at a slower pace and build on their success in subsequent years.

The typical Sprinter profile is a larger company not straying far from the existing portfolio. They price at a premium, are aggressive with in-market trial and average nearly $50 million in one-year traditional advertising spend. After racing out of the gate, Sprinters take their foot off the accelerator in subsequent years, shifting focus from growth to profitability.

Marathoners, often smaller companies, spend one-third as much on advertising in year one, but build support in year two, realizing an average of 80 percent growth in the second year.

via CPGmatters_Products&Solutions.

Advertisements

Breakfast Motivations Differ by Age and Gender


CHICAGO — “Different strokes for different folks” applies when it comes to consumers’ breakfast food and beverage choices, according to a new study conducted by The NPD Group, which found that the motivations driving morning food and beverage choices vary by age and gender.

NPD’s Morning MealScape study asked the question: “Why did you eat or drink what you did this morning?”

Men 18 years and older reported they are seeking to save money and watch their diet for things they’re trying to avoid, while women of that age most often cited losing weight.

The study, which dives into the morning meal and snack occasions and marries the attitudinal with behavioral motivations to reveal the “whys” behind morning selections, also found that for kids under 13, it’s all about having something they like. The same is true for teens, although foods that look good have more importance with this age group.

“Food manufacturers interested in connecting their products with consumers in the morning should align product benefits with consumer needs,” said study author Dori Hickey, NPD’s director of product development. “Understanding the why behind food and beverage selections provides the knowledge to message to your consumer targets in a way that resonates with their individual motivations.”

The most-consumed morning meal food choices — despite age and gender — are cold cereal and fruit, respectively, but the choices after these two items vary by age group and gender, according to NPD’s National Eating Trends, which continually tracks all aspects of U.S. consumers’ eating behaviors. Scrambled eggs are next on the list for kids, while males 18 years and older choose a banana, and females age 18 and up opt for hot cereal. Many of the same foods are selected by the gender and age groups, but rank differently in terms of most frequently consumed, according to the research.

“The morning meal is a growing but fragmented meal occasion,” Hickey said. “For food manufacturers and retailers to operate successfully in this meal space, they need to understand the ‘why’ behind consumers’ morning meal behaviors.”

NPD’s Morning MealScape study included 27,179 participants, both adults and children (parents answered on behalf of their children, aged two to five).

via Breakfast Motivations Differ by Age and Gender – Foodservice – CSNews – FoodService.

%d bloggers like this: